Each submission to ISOC will be assigned to a colloquium and will be evaluated by two Colloquium Co-Chairs (CCCs). When a submission does not naturally fit in a single colloquium, CCCs from multiple colloquia could be assigned (still limited to two CCCs). The four-page paper will be evaluated using the rubric given below. 

​

• Technical soundness (25%): Based on the information provided in the methods and approaches, comparison of the approaches/methods used to state-of-the-art in that sub-discipline and rigor in the construction of the study. 

• Originality and novelty (25%): Based on the author-provided statement of novelty and the contents of the paper, the innovation with respect to state-of-the-art will be evaluated.

• Significance (25%): Based on the author-provided statement of significance of the work, and the contents of the paper, the relevance to current topics in combustion will be evaluated.

• Quality of results and discussion (25%): The short paper should consider key results that will be used to assess the quality of the study, as well as for inferring novelty and significance.

​

The authors should prepare the four-page manuscript in such a way that the evaluation team is able to provide an informed score on these metrics.